Tuesday, May 28, 2024 at 6 PM

Agenda 3 items

1. 1.
   24-0709 Committee Minutes Accepted

   Approval of the Minutes of the Legislative Matters Committee Meeting of May 20, 2024.

   Roll call: 4 aye · 1 absent

   • Lance L. DavisAye
   • Willie Burnley Jr.Aye
   • Wilfred N. MbahAye
   • Ben Ewen-CampenAye
   • Jefferson Thomas (J.T.) ScottAbsent

   • 📎 Minutes - Leg Matters - 5-20-24 Full
2. 2.
   23-1461 Ordinance Recommended to be approved as amended

   Amending Section 12-116 of the Code of Ordinances to create a Safe Streets ordinance, to expedite protected bike lanes.

   {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fprq2\fcharset0 Times New Roman;}{\f1\fnil\fcharset0 Times New Roman;}} {\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue0;} \viewkind4\uc1\pard\nowidctlpar\f0\fs24 Councilors Davis and Burnley provided background information regarding this item. The Committee viewed and discussed the language proposed by the Solicitor's Office for Sections 12-116.3 and 12-116.5, which is highlighted in yellow on the document dated 4/30/24 and available as an attachment to this agenda item. The proposed language states, \ldblquote All obligations and requirements set forth in this section are subject to appropriation and to the capital planning process.\rdblquote\b \b0 Liaison Carrillo stated that the Administration is okay with the language being \ldblquote All obligations and requirements set forth in this section are subject to appropriation\rdblquote and removing the capital planning process language. Following discussion on the matter, Councilors pointed out that the proposed language from the Solicitor's Office highlighted in yellow is not being considered by the Committee during the present meeting. Rather, everything in the attached document except for the highlighted language was being considered by the Committee. \par \par Chair Davis introduced four amendments to the existing amendment that was referred to the Committee. Councilor Burnley stated that he had concerns about the term \ldblquote improvements\rdblquote and would like to ensure it is used appropriately in the Ordinance due to its specific meaning. Councilor Burnley explained that the intention behind this is to ensure that the language in the Ordinance aligns with the actions that can be reasonably expected from the City. \par \par Chair Davis moved to amend the language in Section 12-116.2 (b) to replace the word \ldblquote improve\rdblquote with the word \ldblquote enhance\rdblquote to read as follows: \ul\b As feasible, City of Somerville shall incorporate complete streets infrastructure into existing streets to enhance the safety and convenience of users, construct and enhance the transportation network for each category of users, and foster economic development and new employment.\ulnone\b0 \par \par Chair Davis moved to amend the language in Section 12-116.2 (c) to replace the word \ldblquote improvements\rdblquote with the word \ldblquote modifications\rdblquote to read as follows: \ul\b The City of Somerville recognizes that complete streets may be achieved through single elements incorporated into a particular project or incrementally through a series of smaller modifications or maintenance activities over time.\ulnone\b0\par \par Chair Davis moved to amend the language in Section 12-116.2 (d) to replace the language after \ldblquote opportunity\rdblquote with the following language: \ul\b to make streets and the transportation network better for all users.\ulnone\b0 \par \par Chair Davis moved to amend the language in Section 12-116.2 (g) by replacing the existing language in this subsection with the following language: \ul\b Bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities shall be incorporated, consistent with this ordinance, in all improvements.\ulnone\b0\par \par \pard\f1 The Motions were approved on a roll call vote of 4 in favor (Councilors Ewen-Campen, Mbah, Burnley and Davis), none against, and 1 absent (Councilor Scott).\cf1\par }

   Roll call: 4 aye · 1 absent

   • Lance L. DavisAye
   • Willie Burnley Jr.Aye
   • Wilfred N. MbahAye
   • Ben Ewen-CampenAye
   • Jefferson Thomas (J.T.) ScottAbsent

   • 📎 Safe Streets Ordinance
   • 📎 09.28.23 CC Amendment Section 12-116 Complete Streets
   • 📎 Legislative Matters 2024-04-02 Safe Streets Updated Draft (with 23-1461)
   • 📎 Legislative Matters - 2024-04-30 Safe Streets - Law Revisions (with 23-1461)
   • 📎 06.13.24 CC Amendment Section 12-116 Safe Streets
3. 3.
   24-0693 Mayor's Communication Kept in committee

   Conveying the Surveillance Technology Impact Report for exterior cameras at fire stations.

   {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fprq2\fcharset0 Times New Roman;}{\f1\fnil\fcharset0 Times New Roman;}} {\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue0;} \viewkind4\uc1\pard\nowidctlpar\f0\fs24 Chair Davis provided background information about this item. He stated that the Surveillance Technology Ordinance was a collaborative effort which mandates that any time the City seeks to utilize surveillance technology, it must produce an impact report and receive approval from the City Council. He stated that the matter before the Committee this evening is a request by the City to use surveillance cameras.\par \par Chief Breen explained the nature of this request. He stated that the Somerville Fire Department received a grant at no cost to the City to for the installation of nine cameras in total at Somerville\rquote s six different fire stations, including headquarters. He stated that these cameras would provide a 24/7 live feed to fire dispatch of the fire station\rquote s exterior perimeters and would not record sound. He explained how the camera installation could help resolve some of the issues associated with dispatch not being able to close fire station doors while the fire company is out on calls and would also allow them to monitor the premises for asset protection. He stated that SFD equipment is not secured while the fire company is out and is therefore vulnerable to being tampered with, which has happened in the past in the form of vandalism and break-ins. He emphasized that these are past issues, but the cameras could nonetheless help prevent this from recurring in the future. More broadly, Chief Breen stated that cameras have been on his to-do list for a long time and there are available funds at present to install them at no cost to the City.\par \par Councilor Ewen-Campen sought clarification regarding the circumstances under which footage from these cameras would be reviewed, and whether that would be for criminal matters and/or for monitoring employees. Chief Breen stated that the camera footage would be reviewed for criminal matters but would not be used for monitoring employees. Councilor Burnley asked who will have access to the camera feeds. Chief Breen stated that Somerville\rquote s Fire Dispatch Center and the Somerville Police Department will have access.\par \par Chair Davis expressed concerns with the broad language used in the Impact Report that could potentially enable a wide variety of uses for the cameras. He also expressed concerns with the fact that the cameras are primarily controlled and operated by the police department. He noted the lack of parameters regarding when footage will be viewed and downloaded. He stated that he is glad to hear that the cameras will not be used to monitor employees, but that there is no language in the Impact Report stating this, and he would like to see that language added. Additionally, Chair Davis said that he would like to discuss this matter with a representative from SPD in the committee meeting as well as labor representatives to address collective bargaining concerns.\par \par Councilors noted that while they are supportive of the camera installations for SFD\rquote s purposes, they would like to address concerns regarding ambiguity as to how SPD will use the footage before voting to recommend this item for approval.\cf1\f1\par }

   • 📎 Fire Station Exterior Cameras STIR_FINAL