Thursday, April 2, 2026 at 6 PM

Agenda 2 items

1. 25-1859 Committee Minutes Accepted

   Approval of the Minutes of the Land Use Committee Meeting of December 4, 2025.

   Roll call: 4 aye · 1 absent

   • Lance L. DavisAye
   • Jesse ClinganAye
   • Naima SaitAye
   • Matthew McLaughlinAbsent
   • Ben Ewen-CampenAye

   • 📎 Minutes - Land Use - 12-4-25 Full
2. 26-0204 Mayor's Request Kept in committee

   Requesting ordainment of an amendment to Section 8.1 of the Zoning Ordinance to provide for larger buildings, additional dimensional flexibility, and fewer use restrictions for affordable housing projects.

   {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Times New Roman;}} {\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue0;} \viewkind4\uc1\pard\nowidctlpar\sl264\slmult1\tx360\tx720\tx1080\tx1440\tx1800\tx2160\tx2520\tx2880\tx3240\tx3600\tx3960\tx4320\tx4680\tx5040\tx5400\tx5760\tx6120\tx6480\tx6840\tx7200\cf1\kerning2\f0\fs24 Chair Ewen-Campen shared that a public hearing was held on this item two weeks ago and the committee is prepared to hear from the department regarding additional clarification on changes made to the Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO). Director of Planning, Preservation, and Zoning (PPZ) Dan Bartman spoke about the attached presentation, \i Land Use - 2026-04-02 AH Overlay Presentation (with 26-0204)\i0 , to provide more context and comparison about the proposed changes to the existing zoning. \par Conversation ensued throughout the presentation and clarification around open space was given that it can be considered on top of a building, it is not directly related to complete lot coverage. Following further questions about parking, it was clarified that it is required to be set back 30 feet to avoid encroachment on the buildings and lots. Councilors Ewen-Campen and Clingan expressed concern for limiting parking for affordable housing units and the desire to see further amendments.\par Discussion continued around pre-determined setbacks and the difference in lot sizes between Mid-Rise 3 (MR3), MR4, and MR6 and how it is determined what is most efficient for affordable housing investments. Director Bartman stated that investors are looking for the highest return on investment, which will appear in MR5 and MR6. Director Bartman expanded upon the setbacks in MR3 and MR4, noting that they are flexible, and the current proposal is based upon parcels that will realistically hold affordable housing units. Councilor Clingan inquired how the Medford Street project would be impacted and Director Bartman shared there is still discussion on whether the community path counts as a front, which will determine setbacks. Setbacks are related to the distance from the lot and slide 5 of the presentation clarifies the setbacks for the zoning districts and how they will be determined by the lot width after this change. Upper story step backs are being eliminated as it was determined that they were leading to a reduction in bedrooms. \par Councilor Davis asked about the potential impact for removing masses in the revised AHO. Director Bartman clarified the building code has minimum standards related to health and safety that would preclude developers from building units with varying ceiling heights. What the city has seen is there is no distinction between market rate development and affordable housing units when being made. Director Bartman shared much of these edits come from what has been learned from market rate development. The city is prepared to defer to affordable dwelling developers and the financers for those units and what is the most beneficial for development.\par Councilor Davis inquired about the rationale of the changes to the fenestration requirements. Director Bartman clarified the numbers are all minimum requirements in the table. Councilor Davis continued to ask about the removal of requirements for roof-mounted mechanicals and if this could impact neighbors by allowing bigger buildings to be closer to other lots. Director Bartman shared the requirement to screen the roof-mounted mechanicals still exists, but this amendment gives flexibility about the height of the mechanicals to add, which covers the equipment, screening, and penthouse. \par Chair Ewen-Campen referred to feedback from the public hearing about the confusion of the previous presentation and the desire from community members to include arts space in commercial spaces. Director Bartman said that in-lieu payment is being worked on internally and staff are finding it to be a complex thing to put into an ordinance, with many stipulations and requirements that must be abided by and balanced from a legal perspective. A financial analysis has been completed and PPZ is moving into a legal review to ensure none of the language interferes with the many regulations already in place from the State.\par Councilor Clingan asked for more information on Ground Story Commercial Space. Director Bartman stated that there are certain requirements around apartment building, general building, and commercial building all have separate regulations for requiring space. \par Councilor Ewen-Campen stated the only thing he is opposed to is the parking setbacks and he would like to see an amended version in a future meeting. Councilor Clingan also spoke about parking and how the requirements relate to accessibility. Director Bartman said there are adjustments that can be made to the ordinance to allow for more flexibility to what is allowed for parking. \par \par \pard\cf0\par }

   • 📎 Affordable Housing Overlay Amendment 2026
   • 📎 05.14.26 CC Amend Zoning Affordable Housing Overlay